Water Sentinel WSM-1 Refrigerator Replacement Filter

Tried the MayTag original filters and found they don't last. These are excellent. The water flow is far better and they last longer.

These are my second purchase.

A very affordable alternative to the over-priced original model. This unit fits perfectly and works as described.WaterSentinel WSM-1 Replacement Water Filter

Buy Water Sentinel WSM-1 Refrigerator Replacement Filter Now

Pro's:

-slightly higher water volume than the Maytag model

-OK tasting water

-did not leak

-comes with the stick on date stamp, so you know when to change the filter

Cons:

-longer in length than the Maytag, really not an issue for me, but could be depending on your fridge's shelving.

-I returned this filter because it left a plastic or bitter taste to the water. I fill a quart bottle each day for drinking at work. I was immediately able to taste the difference between this filter and the Maytag one. But, I left it installed hoping that it would go away after a week or so of use. But it didn't, so I returned it.

It's not like I'm a picky water drinker either. I'm totally happy with cheap bottled water like Costco's Kirkland brand more than the expensive stuff like Evian & Fuji and the like. But, the "plasticky" taste was something I really couldn't live with. I gave it 3 stars because the product worked well and build quality was fine. Taste is subjective, so others might like the water it produces just fine.

Read Best Reviews of Water Sentinel WSM-1 Refrigerator Replacement Filter Here

Great filter,Bought 2. No arrows showing removal direction so I drew them on and also Install date. Better price than Sears.

Want Water Sentinel WSM-1 Refrigerator Replacement Filter Discount?

I was under the impression that product was tested aginst NSF standard 42 and NSF standard 53. The first one tests filter for aesthetic effects in the water such as chlorine taste/smell, not harmful to health. Standard 53 tests for harmful contaminants, such as heavy metals, chemicals, and even bacteria. The filter package states that the filter is tested aginst standard 42 but does not mention standard 53. I can only assume it was not tested, and this being the most important function of the filter it's a pretty glaring defect. I

Normally solid carbon filters, as this one claims to be, are extremely effective at removing contaminants, so I cannot imagine why the manufacturer did not proceed with the testing of standard 53.

HS

Save 58% Off